A.P. Fox ([info]aprivatefox) wrote,
  • Mood: hyper

ambition

It is my intention to submit a paper to the Australian Workshop on Interactive Entertainment. The deadline is December 11. That is 42 days to go from what I consider to be a strong, if unpolished concept, to my first paper submission ever. I have not yet consulted with a professor or other such Real-World Force. First, I want a solid outline in hand. It's half-done already. I'm culling citations like there's no tomorrow. No time like the present. If anyone has useful advice for this project, please give it. If anyone wants to tell me I'm insane/stupid/unqualified/ill-prepared/wrong, please stuff it. I know all that already, but I'm going to do this anyhow. I'm sick of failing because I give up before reaching the target. Negativity can stay at home. Advice from the other academics reading this is appreciated, though.

-A.P. Fox


  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 6 comments

[info]mswae

October 30 2003, 21:55:22 UTC 8 years ago

You can do this, no problem. Many academics write conference papers in less time. (Let's not even talk about the phenomena of submitting an abstract to a conference on work you haven't even done yet, and then frantically doing experiments the week before the talk ... I don't endorse that.)

Seriously, you should be able to get a referenced outline to your advisor within a week and then you can write it out over the next few weeks while he changes it behind your back :)

If you want proofing help, just scream. I've been proofing academic papers on subjects I know nothing about since you were in diapers. Well, high school anyway.

Good luck!

[info]ninjakitten

October 30 2003, 22:03:08 UTC 8 years ago

Eeee, how =neat=!!!

...now I'm wondering if I could convince them any of my ideas are within their purview. I mean hey, it =is= interactive entertainment.... ::plots...::

[info]ninjakitten

October 30 2003, 22:05:58 UTC 8 years ago

::looks at site some more. realises something::

Wait... aren't the dates of the conference the same as Katsucon?

[info]sythyry

October 31 2003, 00:23:46 UTC 8 years ago

That's not a short time to do a conceptual paper -- most
academics take only a couple days to write them. (Given
that it's your first one, you're giving yourself plenty of
time but not being ridiculous.)

I have some advice on the art of writing papers. The one
that comes to mind at the 3 a.m. feeding is to intentionally
do a first draft -- write the whole paper crudely,
then go back and edit it into shape. This is important for
conceptual papers. The concept tends to mutate (and
improve) as you write the paper, as you clarify and explain
your thoughts to yoursef.

I'd recommending setting a pretty early deadline for the
bulk of the first draft -- maybe two or three weeks from
today. Citations, polished prose, and suchlike don't need
to be done by then. Often some sections of the first draft
are just "Write this!". But have enough so that someone
else can read it -- e.g., if you happen to know an academic
CSist, especially one on friendly terms outside your
department, esp. one who cooks Thai food.

As always, feel free to ping me for further advice, perhaps
in the daytime. I should be online and not as subject to
babyidles more daytimes starting Tuesday.

[info]zrealm

October 31 2003, 05:15:46 UTC 8 years ago

You should have no problem with this at all. Your info is solid, your writing skills are fine, etc.

As for useful advice, uh... I wish I had some anyway :) If you end up using laTEX for some reason, I know that, but it looks like they've got a Word template too :-)

-Andrew

[info]bercilakslady

October 31 2003, 11:09:38 UTC 8 years ago

I don't have advice, even given my job, but I have no doubt at all you can do this.

*hugs*

May the writing gnomes be with you.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…